Show HN: DeepSeek Flash inverted the economics of agent products https://ift.tt/szDS4h0

Show HN: DeepSeek Flash inverted the economics of agent products There is an adversarial relationship between developers and big model labs. Model labs charged developers higher API prices to subsidize their own agent harness offerings. Think Anthropic charging 5x higher Claude API prices to subsidize consumer subscriptions. So Cursor in a way was subsidizing their own direct competitor. DeepSeek V4 Flash totally inverted this relationship. Now you have a model that beats even Sonnet in some benchmarks and is totally opensourced. Now inference providers are racing to the bottom to optimize and give cheaper hosting. Every player with a non-SOTA is now racing to swap over to stop paying the big model lab tax, even Microsoft is switching Copilot to use DeepSeek. On switching over to Deepseek: - we noticed over a 100x cost decrease while similar or better performance then Gemini 3 Flash - insane saving from the cached input tokens: $0.002/1 Million tokens - both DeepSeek Flash and GLM 5.2 are text-only models, so clearly multimodal training is not worth the additional cost. Language is just a much more efficient sparse representation of the world/reasoning than vision - we had a early bet on a text-only web agent harness, and now with DeepSeek this results in unique cost advantages. - we rewrote our harness as a callable DSL library that a model can generate code to execute on. DeepSeek has proven phenomenal on code generation to drive an agent harness. - I would highly recommend everyone to rewrite their harness to be text-only and callable via executable code leveraging DeepSeek V4 Flash. https://ift.tt/el12Z98 June 25, 2026 at 11:56PM

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Complete Guide to E-Commerce Business: Meaning, Models, and How to Start

Micro Niches: The Secret Weapon for SaaS Startups Struggling to Gain Traction

"From Micro Niche to Money Maker: How I Validated My E-Commerce Idea with AI (No Budget Needed)" Published: September 23, 2025 Keywords: Micro niche, AI validation, e-commerce, free tools, startup strategy Introduction Ever wondered if your e-commerce idea is worth pursuing? In this post, I’ll walk you through how I used free AI tools to validate a micro niche, build a lean store, and test demand—without spending a dime. If you’re stuck between ideas or afraid of wasting time and money, this guide is your shortcut to clarity. Step-by-Step Breakdown 1. Finding the Micro Niche Used ChatGPT to brainstorm underserved product categories. Cross-referenced with Google Trends and AnswerThePublic to check search interest. 2. Validating Demand Leveraged Perplexity AI to analyze competitors and market gaps. Ran polls using Typeform and Twitter/X to gauge interest. 3. Building the Store Created a free storefront using Shopify Starter and Canva for branding. Used Durable.co to generate landing page copy in minutes. 4. Driving Traffic Scheduled posts with Buffer across Instagram, Threads, and LinkedIn. Used Notion AI to draft blog content and email sequences. 5. Tracking Results Monitored engagement with Google Analytics and Hotjar. Adjusted product positioning based on feedback from Tally Forms. Key Takeaways Micro niches are goldmines when paired with smart AI validation. You don’t need a budget—just the right tools and strategy. Testing before investing saves time, money, and frustration. Thinking of launching your own store? Drop your niche idea in the comments and I’ll help you validate it with AI—free of charge!